A New Concept in
Companion Animal Care
!
*
Enroll in DePaw U!
*The Cottage at Pawsitive Energy
*The Bulletin Board

*The Bed & Biscuit
*The Day Camp

*Reservation Request
*Directions & Address  
*Video Diarys      *NEW!!
*
*Baths & ExtraSpecial Stuff
*Pics for Moms & Dads 

*
How We're "Holistic"
*Duke's Natural Pet Products
*About Pawsitive Energy
*Comments From Our Clients
*Thoughts on Humane Living
*Natural Health Tips
*A Job Good for Your Heart
*
Links
*The Dog Blog

*Home
The Spay/Neuter Incentive Project & Sanctuary ~ "snips"
*The Pit Bull Awareness Campaign
*
"Good Search" Raise $ for snips!
*About Our Non-Profit Rescue
*Adoptions & Volunteering

*The "snips" Website


Marysville, Ohio
614/774-3472

wewoof@pawsitiveenergy.com

in association with with snips
natural care & positive activism

 

TAFA

     

*
 For more information on positive activism, as well as information on natural, holistic care, please visit The Spay/Neuter Incentive Project and Sanctuary (snips) website at www.snips.8m.com.

*

 

Pawsitive Dog
Pawsitive Energy
Ohio House Bill 458

  Ses and Me

May 21, 2007


Lori Stewart Price
15649 Myers Road
Marysville, Ohio 43040

Representative Tony Core
Ohio House of Representatives
77 S. High St, 11th floor
Columbus, OH 43215

Dear Representative Core:

I write today to ask for your help in revising the new law regarding the practice of veterinary medicine that you sponsored last General Assembly, House Bill 458. I’ve been a student and an advocate of holistic care for animals for many years and now own a small business that is an extension of those interests and philosophy. We’ve taken the principals of holistic care and applied them to a boarding and day care facility, and created something that is truly unique. We’ve seen that, in the five years since the business came to be, there is a growing awareness of and interest in this more natural, holistic way of caring for our animal companions, and people are seeking us out as an alternative to traditional boarding facilities.

Our business funds a fairly extensive rescue effort, providing for the care of the sixty plus animals that live here. I’ve always maintained that the only way we’re able to afford to take care of this many animals is that we use primarily holistic methods. Our clients see the success we’ve had, and become interested in using holistic methods for their own animals. Unfortunately, there are very few truly holistic veterinary practitioners in this part of the state, so I get a lot of questions from people looking for advice on how to deal with their animals’ various health issues.

With the recent dog and cat food recall, many people are very concerned about the quality of their animals’ food and our business is fielding many questions on how to interpret the ingredient lists provided by the animal food companies. Now that House Bill 458 (HB 458) is in effect, it is illegal for me to simply recommend a natural or home prepared food or suggest an easy way to clean teeth.

HB 458 also makes it illegal for me to continue offering massage to the dogs who stay with us, or to otherwise do anything that could be construed as “diagnos(ing), prevent(ing), or treat(ing) any disease, illness, deformity, pain, defect, injury or any other physical, mental, or dental condition of any animal.” It’s obviously essential that any boarding facility does operate in a way that will prevent illness, disease, pain, injury and other types of physical and mental conditions, and that doing so is not “the practice of veterinary medicine.” In fact, the way the bill is written makes most of what any horse or dog trainer, farrier, behaviorist, dog sitter, groomer – pretty much anyone who has any interaction with any animal – does fall into the category of “the practice of veterinary medicine,” and subject to legal action at the whim of anyone who would decide to use the law against them.

In addition to the restraints the new law places on my business, it also eliminates my choice to work with holistic practitioners who are not veterinarians for my own animals.

Holistic treatments are generally very time consuming, since they don’t deal with “disease” but rather with the physical and mental state of the individual animal. Because of the time involved in providing these services, there is no economic incentive for allopathic veterinarians to provide such services; therefore most allopathic veterinarians do not provide the sort of services I choose. For example, most equine vets do not want to practice dentistry, so that leaves me very few choices for finding someone to work on my horses’ teeth - though I know it is a very important part of their overall health and can lead to a number of different health issues if left unattended. I know of very few veterinarians who offer massage, classical homeopathy, nutritional consultations, NAET, or Reiki as treatment options. Eliminating the lay practitioner’s ability to offer those modalities means my treatment options are limited to things I believe may not be beneficial for my animals. Additionally, the bill sets up a scenario when a veterinarian who spends a weekend at a massage or acupuncture seminar may practice those modalities, while the person who has spent years in the study of the techniques and is far better qualified to practice, is prohibited from doing so.

Since veterinarians have extensive training and education, there are certainly things for which they are more qualified and should only be allowed to provide such as prescribing medicine, performing surgery and the like. However, the new law goes beyond simple common sense, it severely restricts not only my ability to choose what it appropriate for my animals but also my ability to share my experiences with others. I sincerely hope that these are unintended consequences of HB 458 and that you will consider revising the law to restore my ability to choose what is and is not beneficial to my animals.

Sincerely,
Lori Price


Lori Stewart Price
Pawsitive Energy
614/774-3472
www.pawsitiveenergy.com
The Spay/Neuter Incentive Project and Sanctuary
www.snips.8m.com

Pawsitive Dog

Pawsitive Energy
Marysville, Ohio
15 minutes from I 270/Rt 33 in Dublin

614/774-3472
wewoof@pawsitiveenergy.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From http://www.equinology.com/Info/USA_AnimalLaws.asp

New State Law: A new state law effective October 9, 2007 limits chiropractics and massage to veterinarians or nonlicensed individuals under the direct supervision of a vet.

Response from Vet Board: In e-mail from Heather Hissom, Esq., Ohio Veterinary Medical Licensing Board sent April 22, 2003 7:54 AM
“The Board is not currently planning any changes to the Practice Act and there are no matters pending regarding animal massage. The Board's position on animal massage of any type is that as long as the person is not diagnosing, prescribing, adjusting or treating a medical condition, it is acceptable.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aww, baby harp seals are cute.
Too bad they don't know about Canada's spiked club hunt.

- Mark Morford
Friday, April 7, 2006
©2006 San Francisco Chronicle

Let us all agree right now: Baby harp seals -- those doe-eyed sausagelike bundles of puffy white blubber -- are just phenomenally, face-meltingly cute. So adorable and so helpless and so sweet looking, it's like God took Bambi and sawed off all his legs and put him in a white fluffy parka and crossbred him with a puppy, a cherub and a Marshmallow Peep, and tossed him onto the Arctic ice to pose for Polar Baby Gap. I mean, cute.

But baby seals are also, apparently, highly lucrative. Just ask the Canadian government, taking massive heat from the international animal rights community and Pamela Anderson and just about everybody else for allowing a renewed seal hunt this year, giving rights to seal hunters to slaughter upward of 325,000 megacute baby harp seals (among other related species) out of an estimated seal population of about 6 million.

Maybe you've seen the nasty scenario: Apparently soulless, stone-hearted men with giant spiked clubs walk straight up to these helpless and staggeringly adorable creatures and smash their soft skulls in one or two massive blows, all for the sake of profit on the seals' fur (expensive leather goods) and a bit of seal oil (rich in omega-3!), despite no real economic necessity. It's just luxury. It is easy to be horrified.

It is easy to be disgusted and appalled by this senseless and cruel killing, even as you block out the fact that, in America, we kill what, 2 million unwanted dogs and cats per year? Three million? And don't use their meat or fur for anything except some scary medical experiments and perhaps some sort of illegal chicken feed? But, you know, shhh.

Fact is, we in America butcher animals by the billions to feed and clothe our ever-gluttonous population, countless totally not-at-all-cute chickens and pigs and cows, fish and turkeys and rabbits and sheep, all hacked and clubbed and shot and beheaded by the truckload in a thousand different mechanized techniques and no one really blinking an eye except for rabid animal activists and vegetarians and people who secretly miss wearing leather.

But then you merely walk up to anyone and mention how we as a species are still brutally beating these adorable white puffball seals with giant spiked clubs, and maybe you show them a photograph and defy anyone but Donald Rumsfeld or Karl Rove to shudder and recoil in abject horror, even as you munch your fresh order of chicken pad Thai. I mean, horrible.

It's one of those scenarios that raises a decidedly all-American question: Are we all just incredible hypocrites? Have our lives become so complicated and messy and packed with low-grade, everyday hypocrisy across so many levels -- politics, religion, education, sexual mores, etc. -- that we've reached a point where the very notion of hypocrisy becomes flexible and fluid and just another annoying itch we can't quite scratch?

More specifically, is some sort of moral or humane line being crossed with the seals that isn't really crossed with, say, the slaughter of ducks? Is it the primitive, barbaric technique of the seal killings that gets to us? Or the stunning baby seal cuteness? Is it the fact that most harp seals are helpless babies and that we're chemically hardwired to want to protect innocent defenseless infants? Is this the overarching message? Take the cows, but don't slaughter swooning cuteness?

Of course, no one except drunken hunters and Dick Cheney wants to see animals suffer. No one, even happy carnivores, wants to see inside a real slaughterhouse. To see the sausage get made, most agree, is to rethink your relationship to meat and the animal kingdom and to be brutally stunned into lifelong vegetarianism if not an absolute rejection of kick-ass leather boots and cool wallets. This, of course, is what the animal rights groups count on.

Which is exactly why the Canadian baby seal slaughter is, it must be said, the perfect press op for PETA et al. Next to grotesque Japanese whaling, baby seal slaughter is the ideal gruesome PR spectacle. Naturally, PETA and its ilk oppose all forms of animal use, from Chicken McNuggets to leather gloves to bunny paté, but those issues lack the flash, power and sheer visceral horror of smashing cute baby seals. By trotting out pneumatic super-intellect Pamela Anderson to offer lap dances to Canadian PM Stephen Harper if he'll just reconsider the seal hunt -- they're merely leveraging this intense cuteness/brutality dichotomy to raise awareness of all the others. Easy enough.

But then again, not really. Truth is, the seal slaughter does less to increase awareness of all animal cruelty and far more to illuminate the question of just where we draw our lines of allowable consumption. It is modern moral relativism, a question of where the hell you think you reside on the grand karmic spectrum of Who Decides What Lives or Dies.

Do you eat all sorts of meat and love leather couches and cool sheepskin boots and think nothing of it? That slippery line is way, way over there, not all that relevant to your life. Eat only organic, free-range meats, humanely treated and killed? The line moves a little closer, the question becomes more immediate. Vegetarian? Closer still. Vegan, it's right under your nose. Monastic mendicant Jainist who believes in harming absolutely no life whatsoever, including insects, worms and even Ashlee Simpson, to the point where you won't blink an eye for fear of killing one of those creepy little microscopic mites that live in your eyelashes? The line dissolves completely.

Yes, the seal slaughter is barbaric and stupid. Then again, we could all survive without chicken and veal and leather jackets and steaming delicious organic turkey hot dogs, too. If we are to measure the progress of the human species by how many things we remove from the master list of Things We Kill Because We Can, well, we have progressed nearly not at all.

Perhaps it all has to do with trying to have, at the very least, a modicum of conscience, a shred of reverence, a hint of respect for the creatures we consume for meat or oil or pelt. Respect the interconnectedness of all things, even as you consume them. Especially as you consume them. And there's a visceral level of barbarism and cruelty attached to baby seal hunts that, like whaling, serves no justifiable purpose and obliterates any sort of consciousness, compassion or ritual. It is merely slaughter for money. Is this our collective line?

Is our abject disgust at the seal hunt a sign of enlightenment and progress? Or is it merely that the damnable creatures are so unbelievably cute that they release gobs of oxytocin in our brains and we want to love and protect them like tiny Dalmatian puppies even as we enjoy our Niman Ranch hamburgers?

Which is it, deep morality or visceral cuteness? Can you unpack it all? Do the seals even care?

Mark Morford's column appears Wednesdays and Fridays in Datebook and on sfgate.com.

E-mail him at mmorford@sfgate.com.

Page E - 1 URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/04/07/DDGKJI42H51.DTL
©2006 San Francisco Chronicle