The
Dispatch has refused This
website was created to Director
Lisa Wahoff ![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Accusation #1
The Dog Shelter keeps sick dogs and adopts them out to the unsuspecting public. | The fact of the matter is, dogs come in to the Dog Shelter daily. Many are healthy. Some are visibly sick, and some may have an illness or condition that is not yet detectable by any known test or screening process. If the resources are available to treat these illnesses, why not use them? Euthanizing an animal should NOT always be the first plan of action. Prior to the time the contract with the OSU veterinary department ended, sick dogs were not allowed to leave the building until they were cleared of their illness. Many common illnesses can be cured quickly and easily with medication and pose no threat to public health or safety. There is no reason for dogs infected with those illnesses not to be adopted to well informed new families. Before a dog is allowed to leave the shelter, a Veterinary Technician discusses his medical history with his new adoptive home. No dogs are sent out out of the shelter until the adoptive family has been carefully and thoroughly informed of any and all known health and behavioral issues. | |
| ![]() | |
Accusation #2
The
Dog Shelter keeps vicious dogs and adopts them out to the | If a dog comes in to the shelter with a known bite incident, or has a bite incident while at the shelter, the incident is documented in accordance with Ohio bite laws. Circumstances surrounding the incident are investigated. If the incident was deemed unprovoked, the dog is euthanized. If
it is determined there may have been American
Pit Bull Terriers, American | |
![]() | ![]() | |
| Accusation
#3![]() The OSU Department of Veterinary Medicine contended that Shelter Managers dismissed their concerns, overruled their professional advice, and illegally altered dogs' medical records. | The decision to end the relationship between the OSU Department of Veterinary Medicine and The Franklin County Dog Shelter was a mutual agreement based on OSU's desire that their students work with a more diverse animal population. OSU was initially hired strictly to perform spay/neuter surgeries, and not to advise or in any way direct Shelter management policies and procedures. OSU's only answer to shelter overcrowding and illness is mass euthanasia, which was proven to be ineffective. Staff veterinarians did not agree with Director Lisa Wahoff's more progressive and innovative approach, such as developing an extensive network of foster homes, creating "Mingle with the Mutts," and working to develop private funding organizations which relieve the county of the financial obligations for these programs. Several staff members have been questioned and none were aware of any incident in which a dog with a history of any type of aggression or other behavioral issue was placed in a new home without full disclosure. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
More
information to come. | I have never heard anything but positive comments about Lisa and the innovative, progressive programs and policies she has implemented at FCDS. We've gotten great dogs from Franklin County - including dogs who had been at the shelter for long periods. They have all been happy, healthy and extremely well cared for. Thank you Lisa and staff for giving dogs many others would have euthanized a chance for a long and happy life. I also thank you for your willingness to work with Pit Bull rescue to help hundreds of wonderful dogs who truly deserve our love and compassion. Lori
Stewart Price
| Giardia
is a common, easily curable intestinal parasite. It causes Kennel
Cough is a very common Ohio
laws regarding Pit Bull Shelters
and rescues working
|
| |
| Accusations
of adopting out harboring vicious dogs: A vicious dog is defined as "a dog that without provocation 1) has killed or caused serious injury to any person, or has killed another dog, 2) has caused injury other than killing or serious injury to any person, 3) belongs to a breed commonly known as a Pit Bull dog or to a breed commonly known as the Canary Dog". Notice the words "without provocation". It is totally ignorant for anyone to believe that the County shelter knowingly adopts out vicious dogs. If a dog comes in to the shelter with a known bite incident, or has a bite incident in the shelter, it is documented in accordance with bite laws. Questions are asked regarding the surrounding circumstances of the incident. If the incident was deemed unprovoked, then the dog is euthanized. If it is determined there may have been identifiable factors leading to the bite, the dog is further assessed and if appropriate, placed up for adoption with certain restrictions. To not ask questions regarding a bite incident would be irresponsible and inhumane. This is yet another example of an arrogant society that believes in its own superiority and doesn't take the time to learn about the things it doesn't understand. As for the breeds of dogs commonly (and incorrectly) referred to as "Pit Bulls," Franklin County Dog Wardens generally determine the breed when dogs are brought in. It is especially difficult to predict a breed in puppies, who generally do not develop defining features until they are several months old. | According
to experts, Pit Bull Terriers are not always easily identifiable (and
many other breeds are commonly misidentified as "Pit Bulls") despite
what a veterinarian, landlord, or even an 8-year-old may think. Again, we as a society hold the dog more accountable than we do our own species, which is supposed to be superior. If people were more responsible for their dogs and their own actions, this society would not be euthanizing innocent animals based strictly on appearance. Again, FCDS staff is responsible for informing adopters and potential adopters of any and all behavioral issues, bite incidents, and medical information known about the dog. An
example of the Shelter KNOWINGLY adopting out vicious dogs, would have given more
credibility to this accusation, but
since none was given people not knowing any better than to believe what they read
in local publications look at the dog they have adopted and wonder
"Would
my dog bite me?" or "Is my dog a Pit Bull?"
|
| |
| |
According to an e-mail from an OSU Staff Member to a persistent Dog Activist , the decision to end the relationship between the OSU Department of Veterinary Medicine and The Franklin County Dog Shelter was a mutual agreement based on OSU's desire that their students work with a more diverse animal population in order to increase their veterinary experience, i.e., work with cats, etc. Franklin County Shelter employees stated that OSU was initially just providing spay/neuter surgeries for the dogs for several years. Then they were then granted permission by Shelter Management to do basic clinic checks on dogs. It became more evident to the staff that we spoke to that OSU continued to want more and more input and decision making authority in regards to overall Shelter operations. It was also the feeling of these staff members that the focus was not on improving shelter medicine, that they were just providing bodies for ongoing research. OSU
was never given all encompassing decision making authority,
which some staff veterinarians seemed to want. When
the treatments provided by OSU for Kennel Cough were not curing the condition
(i.e.., dogs were receiving the same medications for weeks and when they did not
improve, rather than trying an alternative treatment, vets deemed their condition
"unresponsive to treatment"), the offsite boarding program was started
and funded completely through PRIVATE DONATIONS, and many
lives were saved. (Thank you, "Friends of the Shelter.") It became evident to some staff at Franklin County that OSU Veterinary staff believed that the only way to control illness and overcrowding was to euthanize large numbers of dogs on a consistent basis, while Management strongly believed that there were better and more effective alternatives to mass euthanasia of healthy, adoptable dogs. Shelter Management disagreed with this philosophy but at one point conceded and euthanized nearly an entire ward of dogs only to find that sick animals still came into the shelter, dogs still got sick at the shelter, and overcrowding still happened at the shelter. In other words, the plan did not work. | Shelter Management refused to take part in this again and continued to hope that this teaching facility could come up with another answer to the problem. When it could not, the relationship was severed due to a difference in philosophies THANK GOD. An accusation was also made that dogs who bite or attack other pets are given a clean slate, and their adoptive families are not warned. It was also stated that a program to screen dogs for behavioral problems was disbanded. As discussed under Accusation #1, when a bite is reported, a Bite Incident form is completed and questions are asked regarding the circumstances surrounding the event. County staff is responsible for giving adopters and potential adopters ALL available information on each dog. Several staff members were questioned and none of them know of any incident where a dog's a bite incident information was omitted to an adopter. A
program to screen dogs for behavioral problems NEVER EXISTED - it was not "abandoned"
as reported by the Dispatch. The
MEET YOUR MATCH program is an assessment tool designed
to help match dogs by their play styles and activity levels to appropriate families.
This program is used consistently. We can only hope that the veterinarians being produced by OSU have enough foresight to not always see euthanization as the solution to every problem. Creativity and thinking outside the box is one thing a college education should foster.
|
| |